Category - Latest Judgments

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has vehemently submitted that it was the specific case on behalf of the appellant before the High Court that as the original writ petitioners before the High Court were the...

1. Present reference to the larger Bench is made against the judgment and order in the case of Arup Bhuyan v. Union of India, (2011) 3 SCC 377 as well as State of Kerala v. Raneef, (2011) 1 SCC 784, pursuant to the order passed...

2. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has directed the IRDA, in effect, to revisit the complaint made by the respondent no. 1 and pass a fresh order.

1. Delay condoned.

1. Delay condoned.

1. Pursuant to Article 342 of the Constitution of India, a list of Scheduled Tribes was notified by the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 (for short ‘the ST Order’). By an Act of Parliament of 1976, the ST Order was...

1. Delay condoned.

2. We have heard Shri Saif Zia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Shri Siddhartha Dave, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the original complainant.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 29.08.2007 passed by the Gauhati High Court by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the writ appeals preferred by the...

1. The judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in Criminal Appeal No. 562-SB of 1997 dated January 15, 2010 is under challenge in this Appeal.