Category - Latest Judgments

2. The factual matrix giving rise to the present appeals are as under:—

1. The appellant was accused in a complaint filed under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short “the Act”).

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Respondent no. 1 (dealer in TATA vehicles) and respondent no. 2 are the claimants. Respondent no. 1 took out a fire insurance policy with the appellant for a cover of Rs. 75,38,000/- and respondent no. 2 for a cover of Rs. 90...

1. The current civil appeals,1 under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, (hereafter, “the Act”) challenge orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (hereafter, “APTEL”), dated 06.12.2018 (“first impugned order”)2 and...

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common order dated 05.02.2020 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (for short, ‘National Commission’) passed in the respective Appeal...

1. The Appeals are lodged against the Order passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Civil Revision Nos. 595 and 596 of 2003.

1. Leave granted.

1. The petitioner is accused of having committed offences under Section 409, 420, 468 etc. IPC along with Section 132 d and other offences under the Goods and Services Tax Act and fraudulently claimed input credit.