Category - Latest Judgments

1. The judgment passed by the High Court1 in an appeal2 filed by the respondents is challenged before this Court. The appellants are the claimants who filed application before the Commissioner3 seeking compensation under the...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. The State of Uttar Pradesh (in short “the State of U.P.) is in appeal against the orders of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (in short, “the High Court”) dated 30.09.2022 and 12.05.2023 passed in Writ C No. 37749 of...

. These appeals by special leave are at the instance of a convict-accused and is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.04.2018, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Capital Case No. 4669 of 2017...

1. The appellant/accused - S K Khaja has preferred the present appeal challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 07.01.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Appeal No. 162...

1. The appellants stood charged and convicted under Sections 302 and 120B, while being acquitted under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 279 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) by the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Beed in...

1. Heard Mr. J.P. Cama, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Abhishek Vikas, the learned counsel for the respondents.

1. The Respondent no. 1- Market Committee had preferred two First Appeals being Nos. 1447 of 2006 and 1490 of 2006 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the award dated 07.03.2006 passed by the II Adhoc...