Category - Latest Judgments

1. Leave granted.

1. A hundred and nine Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Ms. T. Archana, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, learned counsel for the respondent were heard at length.

1. “Intoxicating liquor” falls within the legislative domain of the State Legislatures under Entry 8 of the State list, List II, of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution.

1. These appeals take exception to the judgment and order dated 27th October 2010 of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench at New Delhi on a writ petition filed by the appellant before the Bombay High Court, which was...

1. This appeal arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai1 dated 2 August 2024.2

1. The present Writ Petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, was filed primarily for issuance an appropriate Writ, Order or direction directing the respondents Union of India, States and the Union Territories to...

1. By the present appeal, the suspended director of the Corporate Debtor assails the order of the NCLAT1 affirming the order of the Adjudicating Authority2 admitting the application under Section 7 of IBC3 for initiating CIRP4...

1. These appeal(s) assail the correctness of the Final Judgment/Order dated 04.03.2015 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras at Madurai (the “High Court”) in Criminal Appeal (MD) No. 161 of 2011 titled State v. Uma whereby...