Category - Latest Judgments

1. These two appeals are against common judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras1 dated 19.11.2019 passed in First Appeal No. 328 of 2005 and Cross Objection No. 10 of 2012 preferred against a final decree...

1. The petitioner has instituted proceedings under Article 137 of the Constitution read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 seeking a review of the judgment of a three-Judge Bench of this Court dated 25 August...

1. A three-Judge Bench of this Court while accepting the salutary principle that once the recruitment process commences the State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of...

1. A three-Judge Bench of this Court while accepting the salutary principle that once the recruitment process commences the State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of...

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. The appellant is the complainant on whose complaint a First Information Report being Crime No. 21 of 2021 (for short, ‘the impugned FIR’) was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 347, 504, 506, 116 and...

1. For convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Leave granted.

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: