Category - Latest Judgments

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts:

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Leave granted.

1. The suit of the plaintiff now represented by her heirs and legal representatives (respondents herein) for the decree of permanent injunction in respect of the use of passage, more commonly described as ‘common passage’, was...

1. Heard.

1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.

1. The landlady is in appeal before this Court impugning the judgment of the High Court1 passed in Writ Petition 2 filed by the respondent-tenant.

1. Five individuals, namely, Laadkunwar Bai, Jitendra Singh, Nirbhay Singh @ Rajesh Mama, Meharban Singh and the appellant, Santosh @ Rajesh @ Gopal, were prosecuted for the murder of Narayan Singh in the chargesheet arising out...

1. The two appellants before us were implicated in FIR No. 26 of 2005 registered under Sections 143, 147, 148 and 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), by Bannerghatta Police Station, Bangalore Rural District.

1. Twenty-two persons stood accused of the murder of Madhavrao Krishnaji Gabare and were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar, Maharashtra, in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2006.