Category - Latest Judgments

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.

1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.

1. The appellant who is Accused No. 1(‘A-1’) was convicted under Sections 302 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) and was sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and seven years of rigorous...

1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.