Category - Latest Judgments

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 100, Or. 41 Rr. 23, 23-A and 24 — Second appeal — Substantial question of law — If involved — Remand for re-appreciation of evidence — When not justified — Suit for injunction against defendants...

A. Environment Protection — Pollutants/Polluting Industry — Land Use/Misuser of Land/Premises — Master Plan of Delhi, 2021 — Mixed land use — Running a large pathological Lab in residential area — Violation of Clause 15.5 of the...

It has been submitted at the Bar that during the pendency of this petition, final order has been passed whereby the petitioner has been removed from his office and disqualified from contesting further election.

Excise — Central Excise Tariff Act, 1944 — Chapter sub-heading 7311 — Excise duty — Refund of — Bar of limitation — Appellant, manufacturer of cylinders of 14.2 kg gas capacity falling under chapter sub-heading 7311 of the Act —...

Income Tax — Appeal — Tax effect found to be Rs 4,22,830 — On said ground, the Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal and to decide the same on merits — Constitution of India, Art...

A. Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 395, 450 and 342 — Criminal trespass and robbery — Conviction confirmed — Reduction of sentence — If justified — Appellant, an Assistant Sub Inspector along with some others committed trespass in the...

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 482 — Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — S. 138 — Inherent powers — Exercise of — Scope of, if disputed questions of fact involved — Dishonour of cheque — Proceeding for — Cheque issued by...

The present appeal projects and frescoes a scenario which is not only disturbing but also has the potentiality to create a stir compelling one to ponder in a perturbed state how some unscrupulous, unprincipled and deviant...

Education and Universities — Employment and Service Matters — Appointment — Post of Physical Training Instructor Grade-III (PTI Gr.III) — If qualification of B.P.Ed. to be treated as equivalent to qualification of C.P.Ed. for the...

The present controversy arises out of a matrimonial alliance, between petitioner no. 1-Pritam Ashok Sadaphule and respondent no. 2-Hima Pritam Sadaphule. Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 both are highly educated. They were...