Customs — Customs duty — Whether the described item is a medical equipment — Held, the departmental representative conceded before the tribunal that continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis fluid (CAPD fluid) is a medical...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
M/s. Thermax Babcock Wilcox Ltd. v. Commnr. of central Excise, Pune
Excise — Central Excise — Appeal — Appeal to Supreme Court — Demand of excise — Show-cause notice — It is submitted that no excise is demanded on the described item and the decision of this appeal either way would not affect the...
Qamar Hasan Khan and Others v. State of U.P. and Others
It is submitted by Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for the State of U.P. that the directions issued by this Court from time to time, especially the one contained in the order dated 9-3-20151, is in the...
S.E.B.I. v. Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd.&Ors.
Debt, Financial and Monetary Laws — Fraud — Scam — Directed to post the applications on given date
M/s. Maan Aluminium Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore
Excise — Central Excise Act, 1944 — Schedule Ch. 76 — Excise duty — Evasion of — If there is any — Allegation against appellant of clandestinely removing some of the quantities of the finished goods from the factory premises —...
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.
An additional affidavit has been filed by the Conservator of Forests, Agra, State of U.P. pursuant to our order dated 9.03.2015.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. M/s. VST Industries Ltd.
Excise — Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had relied upon the earlier decision in the case of ‘Web Impressions’ and observed that against that judgment, appeal was preferred by the Revenue and the said decision of the CEGAT was upheld...
M/s. Servo-Med Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai
Central Excise Act, 1944 — S. Excise duty — The Cestat set aside the order of the commissioner of central excise and hold that medical syringes and needles are subject to pay excise duty again as a result of sterilization —...
Lalaram & Ors. v. Jaipur Devt. Auth. & Anr.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length.
M/s. Gajra Gears Ltd. v. Commnr. Customs & Central Excise
Excise — Central Excise Act, 1944 — Central Excise Rules, 1944 — R. 57-Q — Appeal to Supreme Court — Benefit of exemption — Whether benefit of exemption under Notification No. 67/95 is available in respect of the impugned pallets...

