Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the writ petitioner has already retired from service, this petition has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such.
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Andisamy Chettiar v. Subburaj Chettiar
A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 115 — Revision — Scope — Allowing the application for additional evidence — Permissibility — When appeal is pending before the lower appellate court — Held, exercise of revisional powers in the...
Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences v. L. Prakasam Reddy
Service Law — Dismissal — Procedural irregularities — Effect of — High court gave finding that the disciplinary proceedings suffered from procedural irregularities and also violation of principles of natural justice — Order of...
State of Haryana & Ors. v. R.K. Gupta & Ors.
Heard Ms. Nidhi Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the State of Haryana and Mr. M. C. Dhingra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
Hanuman Dutt Shukla and Ors. etc. v. State of U.P. and Ors. etc. etc.
Heard Mr. R. Venkata Ramini, Mr. Basava Prabhu Patil and Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in S.L.P. (C) No. 25518/2015, S.L.P. (C) No. 22921/2015 and S.L.P. (C)…CC 16710/2015...
Medical Council of India v. RFDF Medical College Hospital & Research Centre & Ors.
Against an interim order dated 9th October, 2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi, New Delhi, in W.P. (C) No. 9663/2015, Special Leave Petition No. 29443/2015 (now converted into Civil Appeal No. 8681/2015) was filed in this...
Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax Kalkata-I
Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the relevant material.
Rattan Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
A. Land Acquisition and Requisition — Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — S. 24(2) — Lapse of proceedings — Applicability — Any determination under this...
Ali Hasan @ Mallah v. State of Uttarakhand
The appellant is aggrieved by the conviction under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and sentence of ten years and one year respectively with default clause.
M/s. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur
A. Excise — Central Excise Act, 1944 — S. 11AB — Interest on differential duty — If applicable — In MRF Ltd., (1997) 5 SCC 104, it was held duty is chargeable at the rate and price when the commodity is cleared at the factory...

