The petitioner who appears in person prays for addition of Union of India as party respondent to this petition.
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Anil @ Bawa v. State of Haryana
Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302 r/w 149, 148 — Murder — Conviction based on testimony of related and chance witness — Appreciation of evidence — Accused allegedly assaulted deceased thereby causing injuries on the hands, stomach...
Pankajakshi (Dead) Through L.Rs. & Others v. Chandrika & Others
A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 98 — Travancore-Cochin High Court Act, 1125 — S. 23 — Two statutes — Subject matter of — Main object and purpose of statutes — If similar — Held, Code of Civil Procedure does not correspond to...
Union of India & Ors. v. M/s. Hamdard (Waqf) Laboratories
Excise — Excise duty — Refund — Grant of — Interest on delayed refund — Application for refund of duty and interest — It is obligatory on the part of the Revenue to intimate the assessee to remove the deficiencies in the...
State of U.P. & Anr. v. Sushil Kumar Sharma
Labour Law — Award — Validity — Re-instatement — Back wages — Respondent who was appointed as Routine Grade Clerk on 8-5-1983 and he was dismissed from service on 10-10-1983 — Labour Court recorded a finding of fact on the basis...
Precision Rubber Industries (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai
Excise — Appeal to Tribunal — Scope — Held that the show cause notice is the foundation in the matter of levy and recovery of duty, penalty and...
M/s. V.V.F. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Surat-II
We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Indore Municipal Corpn & Anr. v. Harish Tolani
All that the High Court has done in the impugned Judgment is to remove the observations made by the learned Single Judge that the Commissioner or the Municipal Corporation does not have the power to compound any illegal...
M/s. Haryana Suraj Maltings Ltd. v. Narender Kumar
The main contention is that the High Court should have remanded the matter to the Labour Court for consideration afresh having rendered a finding that the materials showed that the respondent had worked for 240 days in a year.
Ashish Ranjan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Seeking interference with interim orders passed

