Category - Latest Judgments

Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 — Ss. 13(1)(a), (b), (c) and 13(2), 14 — Government notification declaring the extent of area constituting affected and benefitted zones and the slab under Part II of...

The appellant was terminated from the services of the first respondent on 31.10.1991. The Labour Court, Kanpur, set aside the termination of the appellant by its award published on 04.10.1997. In the meanwhile, the appellant had...

Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel having entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner has filed the affidavit of Mr. B. Hari, Registrar-cum-Private Secretary to Hon'ble the Chief Justice, High Court of Madras, dated 14...

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302, 307, 120-B r/w S. 34 — Arms Act, 1959 — Ss. 25, 27, and 29 — Criminal conspiracy and murder/attempt to murder — Acquittal — Appreciation of evidence — Test identification parade — If reliable — Accused...

The present appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and order dated 16.12.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, whereby the order dated 6.7.2004...

Motor Vehicles — Motor accident — Accident claim — Compensation — Award — Appeal against, before High Court — Deceased while going on his Motorcycle was hit by the appellant’s bus — High Court in appeal held that the only ground...

A. Labour Law — Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 — Ss. 5 and 14 — Grocery Markets or Shops Unprotected Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme...

Sales Tax and VAT — Bihar Finance Act, 1981 — Ss. 7(3), 23-A, 46(4) — Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 — S. 8(5)(a) — Central Sales Tax (Bihar) Rules, 1956 — R. 2 — Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 — S. 95(3)(ii) — Jharkhand Value...

Mr. K. Sita Rama Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Shree Pal Singh, leaned Advocate-on-record, has submitted that he is appearing for Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2, being a proforma party, is deleted from the...

Leave granted.