Category - Latest Judgments

A. Service Law — Departmental enquiry — Punishment — Quantum of — Interference with — Nature of misconduct — High Court has taken into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case such as nature of...

In land acquisition proceedings pertaining to Award No. 79 of 1982-1983 in respect of the land belonging to the appellants, this Court finally fixed the land value at the rate of Rs. 76,550/- per Bigha, in the Judgment dated 03...

Government Contract/Tender — Construction, maintenance and operation of a slaughter house in Meerut — Grant of work of, on PPP Model to private persons by public auction/tender process — State Government vide its G.O. dt. 29-9...

Constitution of India — Art. 32 — Writ petition — For issuing appropriate directions to the respondents to ensure a proper and decorus conduct of the proceedings in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New...

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondents and interveners. Respondent No. 1 has also filed cross appeal. During the course of hearing, we are informed that the Arbitrator is in seisin of the...

Land Acquisition and Requisition — Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Ss. 23 and 4(1) — Compensation — Determination of — Market Value — Claim for Rs 250 per sq yd instead of fixation of value at the rate of Rs 31 per sq yd by the...

The appellant is aggrieved by the land value fixed by the Collector in respect of the land acquired from her for the first respondent. The Collector fixed the land value at the rate of Rs. 242 per decimal.

The appellant has approached this Court challenging the order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Review Application No. 136 of 2010 in CWP No. 10748 of 2008.

Service Law — Dismissal from service — Punishment of — Proportionality — Enquiry not conducted — Fresh enquiry — When can be dispensed with — Appellant joined as a Constable in the Police service of the Respondent 1/State — He...

The short dispute is with regard to the land value to be fixed in respect of the land acquired from the appellants.