The appellant has questioned the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in relation to Chamber Summons No. 1249 of 2009 arising out of Execution Application No. 318 of 2005 thereby setting aside the attachment of...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Amanullah and Anr. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
A. Criminal Law — Criminal trial — Appeal to Supreme Court/Appeal under Art. 136 — Third person — Locus standi — If exists — Though traditional view of ‘locus standi’ has been that the person who is aggrieved or affected has the...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-I v. M/s. SRF Limited, Manali
The respondent, namely, M/s SRF Limited, Manali Chennai is inter alia engaged in the manufacture of Filament Yarn of various deniers meant for use in the manufacture of tyre Cord Fabrics except 210 denier.
Shiva Kant Jha v. Union of India
At the request of the learned Attorney General for India, we grant two more weeks' time, finally, for the respondent to comply with the directions in our order dated 22.2.2016.
Medical Council of India v. Christian Medical College Vellore & Ors.
On 21st January, 2016, notice was ordered to be served through substituted service and in pursuance of the said order, necessary publication was made in two newspapers and proof thereof was filed on 15th February, 2016...
K.S. Joseph v. Philips Carbon Black Ltd. & Anr.
The appellant is an accused in two cases of similar nature wherein cheques issued by the accused person in favour of the complainant have not been honoured. On behalf of appellant it was highlighted that the cheques bounced on 24...
Pawan Kumar Aggarwal v. State of Punjab & Ors.
It is not in dispute that though an award was passed in respect of the land belonging to the appellant, the appellant has not been dispossessed and hence the appellant is entitled for the protection under Section 24(2) of the...
Union of India v. Jarooparam & Anr.
Applications for withdrawal of application for deletion of R.2 in Criminal Appeal No. 742 and for abatement of Criminal Appeal No. 742/2011 are allowed.
Mohd. Sahid and Ors. v. Raziya Khanam (Died) Thr. Lrs and Anr.
At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the name of respondent no. 2 is ordered to be deleted from the array of respondents, at the risk and responsibility of the petitioners
M/s. Swetha Engineering Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai
Excise — Classification of goods — Appeal challenging order of the Tribunal reclassifying the appellant’s goods

