It is submitted at the Bar that most of the States have filed the compliance report. Learned counsel for the State of Karnataka submits that he will file its compliance report within three days hence.
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Securities & Exchange Board of India v. ICAP India Pvt. Ltd.
Corporate Laws — Securities & Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers & Sub-brokers) Regulations, 1992 — Sch. III Para 3 Explanation — Term ‘annual turnover’ — Interpretation of — Respondent is a stock broker in the...
K.S. Soundararajan and Ors. v. Commissioner of H.R. & C.E. and Ors.
A. Trusts and Trustees — Religious and charitable endowments and trusts — T.N. Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act, 1959 — S. 64(1) — Attached — Scope — Expression ‘attached’ in the explanation to S. 64(1) has to be...
M/s. Indian Instt. of Planning & Mgmt. & Anr. v. M/s. AK & I Advertising Pvt. Ltd.
Arbitration — Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 11(5), 2(1)(a), 2(1)(h) — Appointment of arbitrator — Powers of High Court — Invocation of — Condition precedent — If the parties fail to agree to appoint an arbitrator...
Chief Secretary of Government of Karnataka & Ors. v. M. Habeeb (D) by Lrs.
Leave granted.
K.P. Gupta v. University of Delhi
Education and Universities — Service matter — Removal from service — Validity — Disciplinary proceedings against appellant/Head of Department, Chinese and Japanese Studies — Charge that he had purchased the computer from an...
M/s. Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. v. Inderpal Singh
A. Debt, Financial and Monetary Laws — Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 — Ss. 138, 142(2) and 142-A — Territorial jurisdiction — In the present case, cheque was drawn...
Jayant Juneja v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur
Excise — Central Excise Act, 1944 — S. 11-A(1) — Show cause notice issued under R. 9(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 — Held, beyond the period of limitation and extended period of limitation as per the proviso to S. 11-A(1)...
Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/s. Hindustan Platinum Ltd. & Anr.
The issue involved in these appeals is as to whether the chemical processing of Platinum, Palladium, Rhodium, Gold and Silver is intermediary product which is exigible to excise duty?
M/s. Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Anr.
A. Excise — Central Excise Rules, 1994 — Rr. 96ZO, 96ZP and 96ZQ (since omitted)* — Validity — Interest and penalty on delayed payment — Absence of enabling provision in parent statute — Held, Rules by themselves cannot...

