It is not in dispute that the respondent-assessee is a Small Scale Industrial Unit (SSI Unit). It claimed the benefit of Exemption Notification No. 1/93 dated 28.02.1993 and the successor notification as per which the SSI Units...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
C. Chakkaravarthy and Ors. v. Tmt. M. Satyavathy, IAS and Ors.
Service Law — Promotion — Post of Assistant Engineers — Petitioners allege deliberate violation by the respondents of the judgment and order dt. 22-4-2010 passed by Apex Court in N. Suresh Nathan, (2010) 5 SCC 692 : (2010) 2 SCC...
Veerendra Kumar Dubey v. Chief of Army Staff & Ors.
A. Armed Forces — Army Act, 1950 and Rules, 1954 — Discharge — Enquiry — If mandatory — Though, Rule does not provide for anything beyond an opportunity to the individual concerned to show cause against his contemplated discharge...
Balu @ Bala Subramaniam & Anr. v. State (U.T. of Pondicherry)
A. Criminal Law — Penal Code, 1860 — S. 34 — Common intention — What is — Common intention implies pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to the pre-arranged plan — Common intention is an intention to commit the crime...
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record-Association and another v. Union of India
A. #Constitution of India – #Ninety-ninth amendment – Arts 124, 124-A to C, 127, 128, 217, 222, 224, 224-A and 231 – Judges’ appointment in Supreme Court and High Courts – Judges’ transfers in High Courts – Collegium system...
Pratap Kishore Panda v. Agni Charan Das
A. Service Law — Regularisation — Entitlement to regularisation — Regularisation of ad hoc appointments — Validity — In the present case, State carried out recruitment in a regular manner, beyond the recommendation of OPSC which...
Shailesh Dhairyawan v. Mohan Balkrishna Lulla
Arbitration — Arbitration Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 8, 11 and 15 — Substitution of named arbitrator — If permitted — In the present case, Bombay high court under S. 89 of the CPC, disposed of the suit between the parties by...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore v. Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd.
The present appeal raises classification dispute.
M/s. Cast Metal Industries(P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise-IV, Kolkata
Excise — Excise duty — Classification of goods — Goods in question are meant for specific purpose viz. in the motor vehicles that too for specific model of the motor vehicles as its parts — Question whether the goods are...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa v. Bhagyanagar Metals Limited
Excise — Excise duty — Cellular telephones were imported by the assesses — Valuation of — Assessees had sought to clear the goods by classifying them under Custom Tariff Heading 8525.20.17 — Along with the cellular phones, the...

