A. Customs — Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 — Rr. 4, 8 and 9 — Long term assured parts supply agreement (Ltapsa) — Which rule applicable — Appellant had imported a naphtha based power plant with five gas turbines — Under the...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
M/s. JSW Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise
Excise and Customs — Duty — Demand of, in respect of unauthorised goods warehoused — Interest — Liability to pay — Demand raised in the show-cause notice along with interest and penalty was confirmed — Customs, Excise and Service...
Department of Customs v. Sharad Gandhi
Delay is condoned.
Thajudin Ahamed V.I. and Others v. P.G. Jairaj and Others
Prayer made in applications for impleadment in both the special leave petitions is not seriously opposed.
Rajendra Prakash Agrawal v. Union of India & Anr.
This appeal is directed against the final order dated 19.08.2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 19406 of 2015 filed by the appellant herein whereby the High Court...
Sant Ram v. Dhan Kaur & Ors.
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 20 R. 12 — Suit of the applicant for recovery of possession of the land and mesne profits — Decree — Mesne profits — Determination — Applicant had originally claimed mesne profits at the rate of...
Govt. of A.P. Tr.Prl.Sec. (MA & UD) v. S.B. Kirloskar and Others
Leave granted.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat v. M/s. Haryana Sheet Glass Ltd. & Ors.
The Respondent No. 1-assessee is a 100% EoU which is manufacturing glass sheets. In the process of this manufacturing, it is using furnace oil, light diesel oil and high speed diesel and claimed benefit of Notification No. 1/95...
Vinod Verma v. Union of India and Others
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw these Special Leave Petitions with liberty to file an application for review before the High Court on the ground that the statement made that the case is covered by...
Commissioner of Central Excise-I, Pune v. M/s. General Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd.
It is not in dispute that the respondent-assessee is a Small Scale Industrial Unit (SSI Unit). It claimed the benefit of Exemption Notification No. 1/93 dated 28.02.1993 and the successor notification as per which the SSI Units...

