Category - Latest Judgments

Corporate Laws — Appeal u/s.18 of SARFAESI Act — Condition of deposit — Deposit by borrower of fifty per cent of the amount in terms of the order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal under S.17 of the Act or fifty per cent of the...

Deeds and Documents — Particular Deeds and Documents — Execution of transfer deed, disputed — Order concerning misfeasance held, on facts, set...

The limited issue strenuously canvassed before us in this appeal is to the effect that appellant should have been convicted under Section 324 or 326 and not under Section 307 of the IPC and ought to have been inflicted with a...

In this case the dispute is about the classification of goods known as “Guar Gum and Guar Dal Flour”.

Family and Personal Laws — Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Ss. 12, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 — Maintenance — Unsuccessful divorce proceedings cannot adversely affect the maintainability of application for...

The issue in these appeals is as to whether the goods of the respondents would classify as “Compact Media Centre” or “K-Yan Computer Systems”.

A. Customs — Classification of goods — Appellant imported power lenses — These lenses were treated as semi-finished by the Department because they were fitted after customizing according to the prescription — Held, on facts, such...

Applications for exemption from filing certified copy as well as plain copy of the impugned order and permission to file the special leave petition without certified copy as well as plain copy of impugned order are allowed.

Leave granted

Both the appellants herein are convicted by the Trial Court for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “I.P.C.”) and given life imprisonment.