A. Securities, markets and Exchange — Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub-brokers) Regulations, 1992 — Para I(4) of Sch. III — Fee continuity benefit — Composite and concomitant membership — If...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Shirish Madhukar Dalvi v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
By the impugned assessment, which has been upheld till the High Court, addition of only Rs. 3.85 lakhs to the income of the assessee/appellant was made and the tax effect thereof would still be much less.
C.I.T., Central-1, Calcutta v. M/s. Hemraj Mahabir Prasad Ltd., Calcutta
This appeal pertains to Assessment Year 1991-1992 and the tax effect is Rs. 8,84,860/-. As per Instruction No. 2/2005 dated 24.10.2005 of the CBDT, no appeals were to be filed where the tax effect was less than Rs. 10 lakhs.
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab
We have perused the impugned judgment and the relevant record. Looking at the facts of the case and in view of the peculiar fact that the appellant is quite aged and suffers from some ailments, the sentence imposed upon him is...
State of U.P & Ors. v. State of U.P & Ors.
Education and Universities — Education — Schools — Service Matter — Appointment — Posts of Assistant Teacher — Grievance that there are number of candidates who have secured more than 70% marks in TET examination in the general...
Bar Council of India v. Ajayinder Sangwan and Ors. & Etc.
We have heard Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Senior counsel and other learned Senior counsel appearing for the parties.
Holeyappa and Others v. Patel Ganapathi and Others
Crl.MP. No. 18071 of 2015 for exemption from surrendering is allowed.
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. v. Manoj Mishra and Others
Application for permission to file appeal is allowed. Issue notice.
U.P. Power Corporation Limited and others v. Vimla Devi and another
Infrastructure laws — Energy — Short assessment — Basis for assessment when there is short assessment for a long period — Appellants prayed for removing adverse observations made by the High Court against the conduct of the...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Daman v. M/s. Sahajanand Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Excise — Excise duty and penalty — Levy of — Assessees are 100% EOUs who were supplying goods to EPCG licence holders and accordingly, in terms of S. 3 of the Central Excise Act, such sales were to be considered as DTA sales for...

