Category - Latest Judgments

A. Labour Law — Regularisation of Army Porters — Scope of — Held that consistent with the position in law and the background of the case in regard to regularisation, a mandamus to the Union government to regularise cannot be...

The respondent was employed with the appellant-bank and was during the relevant period posted as Officer in-charge at the appellant-bank's Sultanpur branch in District Sultanpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh. He was, by an order...

As far as the re-promulgation of an Ordinance is concerned, I am of opinion that the re-promulgation of an Ordinance by the Governor of a State is not per se a fraud on the Constitution.

Advocates — Advocates Act, 1961 — Ss. 16 and 23(5) — Designation as senior advocates — Application for recall the order reserving the matter for orders — Writ petition filed before the high court challenging the constitutional...

This proceeding is a sequel to the order and directions issued on 21 October 2016. In the previous order of this Court, the status report submitted by the three member Committee (consisting of Justice R M Lodha, Justice Ashok...

We do not find good ground to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court. In paragraph 14 of the order of the High Court, the High Court itself observed that the matter is kept pending for a period of one year, during...

Writ Petitions are admitted.

It is submitted by Mr. P. Vishwanatha Shetty, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner that the High Court has erred in sustaining the order of detention despite the fact that six grounds were mentioned in the earlier...

Heard Mr. Dhruv Kapur, learned counsel for the petitioner in the presence of petitioner who is personally present.

Delay condoned.