Category - Latest Judgments

Criminal Law — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 204 — Issue of process — Proceeding with complaint — Scope — Held, unless the Magistrate is satisfied that there is sufficient ground for proceeding with the complaint or...

With the consent of counsel for the parties, all the matters of the State of Uttar Pradesh and Haryana on the issue arising in the instant matters are taken on record and shall be governed by this order.

Limitation — Limitation Act, 1963 — Arts. 18, 55 and 113 — Difference between Art. 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides for filing of a suit for recovery of money for work done by the plaintiff, within three years from the...

Income Tax — Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 263 — Appeal — Appeal against the order of the high court setting aside the order of the commissioner of income tax in exercise of his revisional jurisdiction issuing show cause notice and...

Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the relevant material.  

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order dated 14th December, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras.

Though these interlocutory applications filed by the State of Tamil Nadu have not been listed, they are taken on Board.

We have heard Mr. R. Basant, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant viz., Chandran and Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State and perused the record.

This Court vide order dated 28th February, 2017, taking note of the submissions of Mr. Sriram Parakkat, learned counsel appearing for the applicant in I.A. No. 247 of 2017, had directed as follows:—

On a request made by the Court, Sh. Gopal Subramonium, learned senior counsel, has graciously agreed to make an attempt for mediation settlement of the disputes between the parties.