Category - Latest Judgments

On 3rd and 4th June, 1965, the residential premises of the appellant's father were searched by the officers of the Government of India in exercise of the authority conferred upon them under Rule 126L(2) of the Defence of India...

Though several contentions are raised in these appeals, finally the learned counsel for the appellants has come down to one submission, since according to him, he is entitled to succeed on that.

The issue raised in this case, as to whether reservation is available in upgradation simplicitor, is covered in favour of the appellant by the decision of this Court in the case of appellant itself (Civil Appeal No. 5286-5287 of...

The appellant is before us aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in First Appeal No. 1662 of 1996, dated 22.12.2006.

Diary Nos. 22319/2017, 22655/2017, 25266/2017, 28242/2017, 27453/2017 and SLP (C) No. 21339 of 2017 are taken on Board. Tag these matters along with SLP(C) No. 12538/2016, if they are not tagged already.

Though these matters were to be taken up at 2.00 p.m., learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General and learned senior counsel for the respondents agreed to have it taken in the first hour.

Diary No. 37490 of 2017 is taken on Board.

Issue notice, returnable in three weeks.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties in respect of issues pertaining to violation of Section 6 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the “MMDR Act”) and violation of...

Leave granted.