Category - Latest Judgments

This appeal arises out of the impugned judgment dated 19.07.2010 passed by the High Court of Delhi in FAO(OS) No. 435 of 2010 in and by which the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant thereby upholding the...

These review petitions are directed against the judgment dated 01.08.2019 passed in Manoharan v. State by Inspector of Police1, wherein this three-Judge Bench had affirmed conviction of the accused Manoharan for offences...

By the impugned order passed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), the High Court has recalled its earlier order dated 26.04.2010 giving protection to the Appellant and his wife (Respondent No. 1).

Heard learned counsel for both sides.

Heard Sh. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India, Sh. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General of India, Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Additional Solicitor General, Mr. P.S. Narasimha, learned senior counsel.

   Consumer Protection ---- Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ---- Ss. 2(1)(d)(ii), 20 ---- Complaint ---- Maintainability ---- Government servant ---- Whether falls under definition of a “consumer” ---- Complainant...

The appellant, calls in question, his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC’, for short) by the High Court.

Leave granted.

This Appeal is filed against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow (hereinafter, ‘the Tribunal’) by which the order of dismissal of the Respondent dated 23.07.2012 was set aside.

H.H. Sri Sundara Ramanuja Periya Jeer Swamigal of Periya Jeer Swamigal Mutt, Tirupati and five others (hereinafter referred to as “devotees”) filed O.S. No. 178 of 1982 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Madurai for a declaration...