This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the final order and judgment dated 01.06.2006 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in SB Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 180 of 1989 in and by which the High Court...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. National Bulk Handling Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
This civil appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, by the opposite party, in Consumer Case No. 2 of 2010, filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, aggrieved by...
Usha Ananthasubramanian v. Union of India
Corporate Law ---- Companies Act, 1956 ---- Ss. 241, 337 and 339 ---- Mis-management ---- Omission to take precautions or preventive steps to prevent fraud ---- Order passed by NCLT freezing assets of appellant / CEO & MD of...
I.C.D.S. Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
Heard counsel for the parties.
Roopsi Varun Gupta v. Varun Vikram Gupta
1. On the basis of pleadings and the counter affidavit, it is surprising to note that the respondent contends that the factum of the birth of the child has not been informed to him.
State Bank of India v. Shakti Bhog Foods Limited
1. List on Thursday, the 13th February, 2020.
Union of India and Another v. Mukesh and Others
We have heard Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Union of India and NCT of Delhi.
Sakkubai etc. etc. v. State of Karnataka and Others
A. Ancient and protected monuments, art and antiquities - The Mysore ancient and historical monuments and archaeological sites and remains act, 1961 -Ss. 2, 4, 19(1), 19(3) and 20(1) - Hampi world heritage...
Rajeev Kourav v. Baisahab and Others
The above Appeal is filed against the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur by which a criminal proceeding against Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 was quashed in exercise of its power under Section 482...
Brig. Nalin Kumar Bhatia v. Union of India and Others
Whether the non-empanelment of the Appellant for promotion to the rank of Major General was contrary to the promotion policy is the question that arises for consideration in the above Appeal.

