Category - Latest Judgments

Latest Judgments of Supreme Court

Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab

A. Criminal Law – Penal Code, 1860 – S. 107 – Abetment – Ingredients – Men rea – Held, is necessary as in other offences – There ought to be an act of commission or illegal omission or instigation or intentional aid pointing to...

Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha and Another v. State of Gujarat

Invoking its powers under Section 5 of the Factories Act, 19481, the State of Gujarat has exempted factories from observing some of the obligations which employers have to fulfil towards the workmen employed by them.

Satish @ Sabbe v. State of Uttar Pradesh

These petitions, which were heard through video conferencing, have been filed by Satish and Vikky @ Vikendra alias Virendra, seeking special leave to appeal against a common order dated 28.04.2017 of the Allahabad High Court...

Neetu Yadav v. Sachin Yadav

The wife has come up with the above petition seeking transfer of a divorce petition bearing H.M.A. No. 3200 of 2019 titled as “Sachin Yadav v. Neetu Yadav” filed by the respondent-husband on the file of the Principal Judge...

Kaushik Chatterjee v. State of Haryana and Others

Seeking transfer of three criminal cases, all pending on the file of the Court of the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Gurugram, Haryana, to any competent Court in New Delhi, a person who is implicated as one of the accused in...

Subed Ali and Others v. State of Assam

The conviction of the appellants under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “I.P.C.”) by the Sessions Judge, North Lakhimpur, has been affirmed by the High Court, sentencing them to life imprisonment along with...

State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Amit Shrivas

The respondent raises a claim of entitlement to compassionate appointment on account of the demise of his father late Shri Ranglal Shrivas, who was working as a Driver in the Tribal Welfare Department, Bhind, Madhya Pradesh...

State of U.P. and Others v. All India Kaimur Peoples Front

Learned senior counsel for the appellant-State submits that he has obtained instructions during the lunch recess and he has instructions not to press the appeals in view of subsequent developments.