Category - Latest Judgments

1. Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn our attention to the order dated 11.12.2009 in terms whereof the DGFT is required to decide the issue as to whether the appellant had complied with condition 6.2 mentioned in page...

1. Respondent No. 2, the Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), filed an application before respondent No. 3 namely, the Assistant Registrar of the Geographical Indications Registry...

1. Leave granted.

1. This Appeal is filed against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court by which the Appeal filed by Respondent No. 3 was allowed and the Writ Application filed by the Appellant stood dismissed.

1. The Appellant is the 1st Plaintiff in the suit and the Respondent No. 1 is Defendant No. 1.

1. Leave granted.

1. Hena Bibi, respondent No. 2/complainant claimed to be the legally married wife of the appellant, the marriage having been solemnised on 8.2.2000 as per Muslim customs & rites.

1. This appeal arises from a judgment dated 31 March 2021 of a Single Judge of the High Court of Gujarat.

1. Indian Railways is the largest civilian employer in the country comprising of six production units and eighteen zones, with each zone having three to six divisions.1

2. These appeals have arisen from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 11 April 2014, upon a writ petition1 instituted by the first respondent, the Residents' Welfare Association2 of...