Category - Latest Judgments

Leave granted

The appellant is aggrieved by the order passed by the Company Judge directing prosecution of the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, initiating proceedings for contempt...

A. Excise — Central Excise Act, 1944 — S. 2(f)(i) — Cold-rolling on the hot-rolled stainless steel patta/pattis — If amounts to manufacture — Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System (HSN) classifies cold rolled strips...

A. Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302 and 34 — Murder — Conviction based on testimony of single witness — Appreciation of evidence — Emphasis on value, weight and quality of evidence, rather than on quantity, multiplicity or plurality of...

Heard learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 The others are proforma respondents and it is not necessary to issue notice to them.

Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Union of India, and Mr. Vikas Singh Jangra, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh.  

It is not necessary for us to refer to the pleadings of the 1st respondent-plaintiff and the appellants-defendants as they are referred in detail in the judgments of the Courts below.

Government Contract/Tender — Construction, maintenance and operation of a slaughter house in Meerut — Grant of work of, on PPP Model to private persons by public auction/tender process — State Government vide its G.O. dt. 29-9...

Government Contract/Tender — Settlement of ghat by auction — Even though the appellant-society had neither participated in the auction nor submitted the bid, appellant-society’s opinion was obtained on the higher Dak and the...

Breach of privilege motion — Reply submitted by accused stating her statement did not have anything to with the conduct of the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly