A. Customs — Anti-dumping duty — Exemption under Noti. No. 69 of 2000 dt. 19-5-2000 — Whether retrospective — Use of words ‘nothing contained in the Notification “shall apply to imports” …. Using a Blast Furnace “if he follows”...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Leisure Wear Exports Ltd.
Insurance — Marine insurance — Loss of insured goods in transit — Complaint before consumer forum — Locus standi — Assignment of contract of insurance policy — Effect — Respondent/complainant, engaged in the business of sale of...
Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. v. Konark Power Projects Ltd. and Anr.
Energy and Power — KERC (Power Procurement from Renewable Sources by Distribution Licensee) Regulations, 2004 — Regn. 5.1 r/w Rgns. 9 of KERC (Power Procurement from Renewable Sources by Distribution Licensee and Renewable Energy...
L.C. Hanumanthappa (Since Dead) Represented by his Lrs. v. H.B. Shivakumar
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 6 R. 17 — Doctrine of relation back — Scope and application — Amendment of plaint sought upon remand by the High Court to add the relief of declaration of title to the already existing relief for...
Delhi Development Authority v. Suresh Kumar Nangia and Ors.
Delay condoned.
State of Haryana & Anr. v. Devander Sagar & Ors.
A. Land Acquisition and Requisition — Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Time table — Reiterated — Upon the publication of a Notification, affected landowners are required to file Objections within thirty days — Although no period has...
Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras v. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission
Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel having entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner has filed the affidavit of Mr. B. Hari, Registrar-cum-Private Secretary to Hon'ble the Chief Justice, High Court of Madras, dated 14...
Bismillah Be (Dead) by L.Rs. v. Majeed Shah
Leave granted.
Essar Teleholdings Ltd. v. Central Bureau of Investigation
A. Criminal Law — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 223 — Joint trial — When permissible — Provisions of joint trial are only enabling provisions — It is only a discretionary power and Court may allow it in a particular case if...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore v. M/s. Himalaya Drug Company
Excise — Excise duty — Transaction value of product — Determination — MRP mentioned is to be the sole consideration — Tariff classification — Valuation of products — Dispute as to — Respondent-assessee is in the business of...

