A. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Ss. 7 and 13(2) — Evidence Act, 1872 — S. 3 — Illegal gratification — Trial for — Trap witness — Testimony of — Acceptance of — May require corroboration depending on facts and...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
M/s. Purolator India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi – III
Excise — Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 — S. 4 — Whether cash discount cash discounts have taken into account in arriving at price — Position after 2000 Amendment — Since, what has to be seen in order to arrive at the correct...
M/s. Secure Meters Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs New Delhi
Excise — Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 — S. 2 — General Rules for the Interpretation of the First Schedule — Import Tariff — R. 3(c) — Excise duty — Appellant, who was engaged in the manufacture of electricity meters, imported...
M/s. Gajra Gears Ltd. v. Commnr. Customs & Central Excise
Excise — Central Excise Act, 1944 — Central Excise Rules, 1944 — R. 57-Q — Appeal to Supreme Court — Benefit of exemption — Whether benefit of exemption under Notification No. 67/95 is available in respect of the impugned pallets...
K. Mohana Pillai v. The Secretary to the Govt. Rural Dev. Dep.
A. Service Law — Deputation — Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules — R. 16 — Departmental enquiry — Penalty — Which department — Competent to impose — Held, it is the parent department of the concerned employee...
Samar Pal Singh v. Chitranjan Singh
Rent Control and Eviction — Eviction — Protection to tenant — A building which can be used for residential as well as commercial purposes cannot be said to be excluded from the clutches of proviso to sub-section (4) of S. 20, if...
Stantech Project Engg. Pvt. Ltd. v. Nicco Corporation Ltd.
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 100 — Appeal — Prolongation of litigation — If could be allowed to parties by court — Order passed by the Division Bench of High Court setting aside the Order passed by the Company Judge rejecting...
Raj Kumar v. Asstt. General Manager, State Bank of India
The appellant is aggrieved since the order for reinstatement passed by the Labour Court has been interfered by the High Court substituting the Award with one time payment of compensation of Rs. 75,000/-.
Tejram Patil v. State of Maharashtra
A. Criminal Trial — Dying declaration — Admissibility — Circumstances of transaction relate to death of another person — statement cannot be held to be inadmissible when circumstances of “his” death are integrally connected to...
Vinod Kumar and Ors. v. Secretary Ministry of Communication and Ors.
Delay condoned.

