The question that falls for consideration is as to whether the Virginiamycin imported under brand name STAFAC 1000 is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 2941.90 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2941.90 or under Customs...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
The Management of Narendra & Company Private Limited v. The Workmen of Narendra & Company
A. Labour Law — Re-instatement — Award on back wages — Challenge to — Back wages — If could be denied on ground of industry becoming non-functional — Single Judge of High Court holding that award on back wages would be limited to...
Madhukanta M. Chinchani & Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr.
The appellants are aggrieved since they are not granted just and fair land value in respect of the land acquired from them. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, we do not think it necessary to go in detail to the...
M/s. Electro Optics (P) Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu
A. Sales Tax and VAT — Sales tax — Demand of tax and penalty — Classification of the goods sold by the appellant — Appellant, who is engaged in the sale of electronic goods (survey instruments) imported from other countries...
Delhi Development Authority v. Amarjeet Rewari & Ors.
Land Acquisition and Requisition — Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Ss. 11 and 24(2) — Held, on facts, liberty granted to appellants to initiate fresh...
Pareshbhai Annabhai Sonvane v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
The sole appellant was accused no. 2 before the Sessions Judge, Surat in Sessions Case No. 278/2008 along with three other co-accused for offences under Sections 395, 397 and 504 of the IPC.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.
An additional affidavit has been filed by the Conservator of Forests, Agra, State of U.P. pursuant to our order dated 9.03.2015.
Bhanushankar Oghadbhai Mehta(D) by Lrs. v. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation Limited & Anr.
Land Acquisition and Requisition — Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Ss. 23, 23(1-A), 23(2) — Interest on Solatium amount awarded — Applying the ratio in Sunder, (2001) 7 SCC 211 — Held — In view of the Constitution Bench judgment in...
Pawan Kumar Pathak v. Mohan Prasad
Evidence — Admissibility — Inconsistent with pleadings — What is — In the present case, in order to prove that the appellant was the adopted son, the appellant summoned the record of the sub-registrar to bring on record adoption...
Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Tiruchirappalli v. Hindustan Lever Limited
The respondent herein had imported 3800 metric tonnes of soda ash light from M/s. Qing Dao Soda Ash Industrial Co. Ltd., China.

