(Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha and Krishna Murari, JJ.)
Baje Singh (Dead) Through his Legal Heirs __________ Petitioner;
v.
State of Madhya Pradesh and Another _______________ Respondent(s).
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 21876/2020, decided on October 29, 2020
(For Admission and I.R. and IA No. 106733/2020-Exemption From Filing O.T. and IA No. 106731/2020-Permission to File Petition (SLP/TP/WP/..)
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 21876/2020; MP No. 2207/2020; IA No. 106733/2020; and IA No. 106731/2020
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Permission to file special leave petition is granted.
2. Shri Siddhartha Bhatnagar, learned senior counsel, points out that para 27 of the impugned judgment states that the writ petition of the State is liable to be allowed. He, therefore, apprehends that the Executing Court may not follow the Supreme Court’s Judgment cited therein, namely Gurpreet Singh v. UOI (2006) 8 SCC 457.
3. We make it clear that this apprehension is totally without basis for the reason that all Courts in this country, including the Executing Court, are bound by the judgment of the Apex Court.
4. The special leave petition stands disposed of.
———
