(Uday Umesh Lalit, Hemant Gupta and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ.)
Review Petition (Civil) Nos. of 2021 (Diary No. 10593 of 2021) In Civil Appeal Nos. 337, 340, 353, 360 and 386 of 2021, decided on December 8, 2021
Asha Ram(d) Thr. LRs and Others ___________________ Petitioner(s);
v.
U.P. Awas Evam Vikash Parishad and Another _______ Respondent(s).
With
Review Petition (Civil) No. of 2021 (Diary No. 10896 of 2021)
In
Civil Appeal No. 384 of 2021
Yasin(d) Thr. LRs. and Another _____________________ Petitioner(s);
v.
U.P. Awas Evam Vikash Parishad and Others _________ Respondent(s).
With
Review Petition (Civil) Nos. of 2021 (Diary No. 10912 of 2021)
In
Civil Appeal Nos. 359, 377, 378, 379, 387 of 2021
Dinesh Kumar Etc. ___________________________ Petitioner(s);
v.
U.P. Awas Evam Vikash Parishad and Others _______ Respondent(s).
Review Petition (Civil) Nos. of 2021 (Diary No. 10593 of 2021); Civil Appeal Nos. 337, 340, 353, 360 and 386 of 2021; Review Petition (Civil) No. of 2021 (Diary No. 10896 of 2021); Civil Appeal No. 384 of 2021; Review Petition (Civil) Nos. of 2021 (Diary No. 10912 of 2021); and Civil Appeal Nos. 359, 377, 378, 379, 387 of 2021
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Applications for listing Review Petitions in open Court are rejected.
2. Applications for permission to file Review Petitions are allowed.
3. The judgment under review had considered the rival submissions and all the circumstances on record and then concluded that compensation awarded by the Reference Court at the rate of Rs. 120/- per square yard was the correct measure and that the market value determined by the High Court could not be sustained either on the basis of the sale-deeds or on the strength of judicial order.
4. We have gone through the contents of the Review Petitions. None of the ground raised in support of the Review Petitions makes out any error apparent on record to justify interference in Review Jurisdiction.
5. All the Review Petitions are, therefore, dismissed.
———
