Latest Judgments

Antony Mathew v. P.M. Mathew & Ors.

There is an inordinate delay of 138 days in filing the Review Petitions. We are not satisfied by the explanation offered for the same.

(S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.)

Antony Mathew ____________________________________ Petitioner

v.

P.M. Mathew & Ors. _____________________________ Respondent(s)

Review Petition (Civil) Nos. 1807-1808 of 2018 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 35632-33 of 2017, decided on July 10, 2018

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. There is an inordinate delay of 138 days in filing the Review Petitions. We are not satisfied by the explanation offered for the same. The Review Petitions are, therefore, liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay itself.

2. We have perused the Review Petitions and the connected papers. Even on merits, we do not find any error in the order impugned, much less an apparent error on the face of the record, so as to call for its review.

3. Hence, the Review Petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay as also on merits.

R.P.(C) No. 1807-1808/2018 in SLP(C) No. 35632-35633/2017

Antony Mathew ____________________________________ Petitioner

v.

P.M. Mathew & Ors _____________________________ Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No. 73000/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION)

Date : 10-07-2018 These petitions were circulated today.

(Before S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.)

By Circulation

UPON perusing papers the Court made the following

ORDER

4. The Review Petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay as also on merits in terms of the signed order.

5. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of.

———