(R. Banumathi and Indira Banerjee, JJ.)
Kusumben Indersingh Dhupia _______________________ Petitioner
v.
Sudhaben Biharilalji Bhaiya & Anr. ________________ Respondent(s)
(Advocate: K.V. Sreekumar)
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12794/2014, decided on December 4, 2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. During the course of hearing of arguments of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, it was noticed that service on respondent no. 2 is not complete. By perusal of the office report, it appears that in spite of service of notice three/four times to respondent no. 2, service is still incomplete.
2. Service to respondent no. 2 shall be effected by substituted service through publication in vernacular language, Gujarati daily newspaper having wide circulation in the locality in which the respondent no. 2 is last known to have actually and voluntarily resided.
3. List the matter on 9th January, 2019.
———
