(A.M. Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.)
Seema Sapra _______________________________________ Appellant;
v.
Court on its Own Motion ____________________________ Respondent.
Criminal Appeal Diary No. 10342/2016, decided on July 12, 2019
[Only I.A. No. 62789/2019 – Modification of Court Order and I.A. No. 99303/2019 – Appropriate Order/Directions in WP(C) No. 13/2018 Listed) With W.P.(C) No. 13/2018 (X) IA No. 99303/2019 – Appropriate Orders/Directions IA No. 62789/2019 – Modification of Court Order) W.P.(C) No. 001027/2018 (X) IA No. 122904/2018 – Permission to Appear and Argue in Person)
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. We have heard the petitioner-in-person on the applications for issue of appropriate directions/order and for modification of previous Court order, for over one hour.
2. After hearing the petitioner-in-person for quite some time, we asked her to confine her arguments to the issues which may require our consideration. She submitted that one of us (A.M. Khanwilkar, J.) should recuse. For that, she invited our attention to the averment made in I.A. No. 62789 of 2019 in particular. Such request cannot be accepted merely for asking by the petitioner-inperson. Reasons for not accepting that prayer will be elaborated in the order to be passed as noted in our previous order dated 11.04.20191.
3. It is open to the petitioner to file list of dates and/or any other relevant document(s), if she so desires. That be filed within two weeks.
4. We reiterate that all aspects will be considered and appropriate orders passed on the concerned proceedings, to be pronounced later.
———
1 Seema Sapra v. Court on its Own Motion, Criminal Appeal D No. 10342 of 2016, order dated 11-4-2019 (SC)
