Latest Judgments

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore v. Otis Elevator Company (I) Ltd.

1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length, we do not think that the legacy issue requires detailed elucidation.

(Sanjiv Khanna and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.)

 

Civil Appeal No. 1802-1803 of 2009, decided on November 16, 2022

 

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore ____________ Appellant;

 

v.

 

Otis Elevator Company (I) Ltd. _____________________ Respondent.

 

With

 

Civil Appeal No. 251 of 2010

 

Civil Appeal No. 1802-1803 of 2009 and Civil Appeal No. 251 of 2010

 

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

 

1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length, we do not think that the legacy issue requires detailed elucidation. Further, for the sake of consistency and certainty, we think that the appeals should be dismissed.

 

2. Accordingly, the civil appeals are dismissed.

 

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

 

Civil Appeal No(s). 1802-1803/2009

 

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore _________ Appellant

 

v.

 

M/s. Otis Elevator Company (I) Ltd ______________ Respondent

 

WITH

 

C.A. No. 251/2010 (IV-A)

 

Date : 16-11-2022 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

 

(Before Sanjiv Khanna and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.)

 

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following

 

ORDER

 

4. The appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

 

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

 

———