Latest Judgments

Delhi Development Authority v. Ram Chander and Others

Leave granted.

(Kurian Joseph and C. Nagappan, JJ.)


 


Delhi Development Authority ________________________ Appellant


 


v.


 


Ram Chander and Others _________________________ Respondent(s)


 


Civil Appeal No. 8629 of 2016 [Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No. 34755 of 2015], decided on August 31, 2016


 


The Judgement of the Court was delivered by


Kurian, J.:—


 


1. Leave granted.


 


2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(C) No. 8467 of 2015.


 


3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.


 


4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.


 


5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the original land owner.


 


6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.


 


Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 34755/2015


 


Delhi Development Authority __________________________ Petitioner


 


v.


 


Ram Chander and Ors ____________________________ Respondent(s)


 


Date : 31/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.


 


(Before Kurian Joseph and C. Nagappan, JJ.)


 


For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Adv.


 


Mr. Rahul Bhatia, Adv.


 


For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.


 


Ms. Vimal Sinha, Adv.


 


Mr. Ashish Kr. Sinha, Adv.


 


Mr. Aviral Kashyap, Adv.


 


Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv.


 


Ms. Sweety Singh, Adv.


 


Ms. Archana Kumari, Adv.


 


Mr. Sumit Bajaj, Adv.


 


Mr. B. S. Maan, Adv.


 


Ms. Smita Maan, Adv.


 


Mr. Vishal Maan, Adv.


 


Mr. Naresh Maan, Adv.


 


Mr. Shitiz Agnihotri, Adv.


 


Mr. Bankey Bihari, Adv.


 


UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


 


Order


 


7. Application for impleadment is dismissed.


 


8. Leave granted.


 


9. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable judgment.


 


10. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.


 


———