Latest Judgments

Mamta Sahu v. Jayendra Sahu

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent in-person.

(Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ.)

Mamta Sahu ________________________________________ Petitioner

v.

Jayendra Sahu _____________________________________ Respondent

Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1659 of 2016, decided on May 3, 2017

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

Kurian, J.:— We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent in-person.

2. The petitioner is also present in person.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent in-person and gone through this transfer petition filed by the petitioner under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Order XLI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and considering the facts and circumstances of the case especially the fact that the petitioner has a daughter of three years old and it will be difficult for her to travel to Pune along with her daughter, we deem it fit and proper to transfer M.P. No. 744 of 2015 titled Jayendra Sahu v. Mamta Sahu from Family Court, Pune, Maharashtra to Family Court, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. We order accordingly.

5. The transfer petition is, accordingly, allowed.

6. The Registry is directed to immediately transmit a copy of this order to both the Courts.

Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1659/2016

Mamta Sahu ________________________________________ Petitioner

v.

Jayendra Sahu _____________________________________ Respondent

Date: 03/05/2017 This petition was called on for or pronouncement of order.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kunal Verma, Adv.

Mr. Sameer Shrivastava, Adv.

Ms. Vijeta Ohri, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Respondent-in-person (N.P.)

7. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph pronounced the order of the Bench comprising His Lordship and Hon’ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi.

8. The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

———