(Kurian Joseph and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ.)
Budh Ram and Ors. ______________________________ Appellant(s)
v.
State of Haryana and Ors. ________________________ Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No. 1036 of 2017 [Arising from Special Leave Petition (C) No. 36446/2016], decided on January 27, 2017
With
Civil Appeal No. 1037/2017 @ SLP(C) No. 36447/2016
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by
Kurian, J.:—
1. Leave granted.
2. It is the undisputed case of the appellants that they are similarly situated as the appellants covered by the order of this Court dated 17.11.2016 passed in Civil Appeal Nos. 11005-11042 of 2016 titled Piyara Singh v. State of Haryana, wherein this Court has taken a view that the 12% increase is to be granted cumulatively from the year 2000 itself and that there should be no cut.
3. The same judgment will apply in the case of the appellants as well.
4. The appeals are allowed to the above extent and the directions granted in the order referred to above shall hold good for these appeals also.
5. However, it is made clear that the appellants shall not be entitled to any statutory benefits for the period covered by the delay.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
7. There shall be no orders as to costs.
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36446/2016
Budh Ram and Ors ________________________________ Petitioner(s)
v.
State of Haryana and Ors __________________________ Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 36447/2016
Date: 27/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
(Before Kurian Joseph and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ.)
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Naeem Ilyas, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Rastogi, AOR
For Respondent(s) Ms. Alka Agrawal, AAG
Ms. Vidya V. Pawar, Adv.
Ms. Anamika Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
8. Leave granted.
9. The appeals are allowed to the extent indicated in the signed judgment.
———
