Latest Judgments

Delhi Development Authority v. Rajender Singh Chauhan & Ors.

Leave granted.

(Kurian Joseph and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ.)

 

Delhi Development Authority ________________________ Appellant

 

v.

 

Rajender Singh Chauhan & Ors. ___________________ Respondent(s)

 

Civil Appeal No. 2690 of 2017 [@ Special Leave Petition (C) No. 17287 of 2016], decided on February 13, 2017

 

The Judgement of the Court was delivered by

Kurian, J.:—

 

1. Leave granted.

 

2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No. 5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015.

 

3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

 

4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given time upto 31st December, 2017 to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.

 

5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the original land owner.

 

6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

 

7. No costs.

 

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17287/2016

 

Delhi Development Authority __________________________ Petitioner

 

v.

 

Rajender Singh Chauhan & Ors _____________________ Respondent(s)

 

Date : 13/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

 

(Before Kurian Joseph and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ.)

 

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Adv.

 

For Respondent(s) Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv.

 

Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Adv.

 

Mr. M. A. Aleem Majid, Adv.

 

Mr. R. K. Rathore, Adv.

 

Mr. Vibhu Sankar Mishra, Adv.

 

Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Adv.

 

Mr. M. K. Maroria, Adv.

 

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

 

Order

 

8. Leave granted.

 

9. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment.

 

10. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

 

———