(Anil R. Dave, J. Chelameswar and Kurian Joseph, JJ.)
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon _________________ Petitioner
v.
State of Maharashtra Thr. STF. CBI, Mumbai _____ Respondent
Review Petition (Crl.) No. 474 of 2013, decided on April 9, 2015
In
Criminal Appeal No. 1728 of 2007
The Judgement of the court was delivered by
We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the review petitioner and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent, at length. We have gone through the judgment sought to be reviewed and we have considered the arguments advanced on both sides. As requested, we have also gone through the judgment of the trial court, in order to appreciate the contention on conviction and sentence. We find that all the arguments advanced by the review petitioner have been considered in detail in the judgment which is sought to be reviewed. Hence, we do not find any error apparent on the face of record or any other ground so as to warrant interference in exercise of our review jurisdiction.
The review petition is hence dismissed.
———
