Latest Judgments

Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma

There is a conflict of opinion in two Division Bench Judgments of this Court i.e. Prakash v. Phulavati, (2016) 2 SCC 36 and Danamma @ Suman Surpur v. Amar, (2018) 3 SCC 343 with regard to interpretation of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as amended by Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act of 2005.

(A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ.)

Vineeta Sharma ____________________________________ Appellant;

v.

Rakesh Sharma ___________________________________ Respondent.

Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 32601/2018, decided on December 5, 2018

(IA No. 139136/2018-Condonation of delay In Filing Civil Appeal)

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. There is a conflict of opinion in two Division Bench Judgments of this Court i.e. Prakash v. Phulavati, (2016) 2 SCC 36 and Danamma @ Suman Surpur v. Amar, (2018) 3 SCC 343 with regard to interpretation of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as amended by Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act of 2005.

2. In view thereof, this matter has to be heard by a Bench of three Judge. Though we are sitting in combination of three Judge Bench, learned counsel for the respondent has drawn our attention to Order VI Rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 as per which the matter is to be referred to Hon’ble the Chief Justice and it is for the Hon’ble Chief Justice to constitute a Bench for hearing the matter.

3. We accordingly direct the Registry to place the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice for constitution of the Bench.

———

Exit mobile version