(A.K. Sikri and N.V. Ramana, JJ.)
United Human Rights Federation ____________________ Petitioner;
v.
Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. and Others _______ Respondent(s).
(with appln. (s) for permission to file SLP and office report)
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)……CC No(s). 14133-14134/2016, decided on August 12, 2016
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. By the impugned order, the High Court has dismissed the application of the petitioner, who wanted intervention in the matter, on the ground that it has no locus. We do not see any infirmity in that order insofar as this petitioner is concerned. If the petitioner has any other remedy available in law it may avail the same. We make it clear that as far as this Court is concerned, it has not passed any order on this aspect.
2. Permission to file the special leave petition is rejected.
———
