(H.L. Dattu, C.J. and T.S. Thakur and Anil R. Dave, JJ.)
Curative Petition (C) No. 270 of 2014*** In Review Petition (C) No. 1422 of 2013** In Civil Appeal No. 4473 of 2000*
Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Defence _____ Petitioner;
v.
Kulsum R. Nadiadwala and Others __________________ Respondent(s).
Curative Petition (C) No. 270 of 2014; Review Petition (C) No. 1422 of 2013; and Civil Appeal No. 4473 of 2000, decided on February 3, 2015
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. We have gone through the curative petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra1, reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388. Hence, the curative petition is dismissed.
CURATIVE PETITION (C) NO. 270 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 1422 OF 2013 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4473 OF 2000
Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Defence _____ Petitioner
v.
Kulsum R. Nadiadwala and Ors ____________________ Respondent(s)
(with office report)
Date : 03/02/2015 This petition was circulated today.
(Before H.L. Dattu, C.J. and T.S. Thakur and Anil R. Dave, JJ.)
By Circulation
UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
ORDER
2. The curative petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
———
* Arising from Rahima I. Nadiadwala v. State of Maharashtra, WP No. 2699 of 1987, order dated 21-7-1998 (Bom)
** Arising from Kulsum R. Nadiadwala v. State of Maharashtra, (2012) 6 SCC 348 : (2012) 3 SCC (Civ) 698
*** Arising from Kulsum R. Nadiadwala v. State of Maharashtra, Review Petition (Civil) No. 1422 of 2013 in Civil Appeal No. 4473 of 2000, order dated 16-7-2013(SC)
1 (2002) 4 SCC 388
