(R. Banumathi and Navin Sinha, JJ.)
Tayo Workers Union of 284 Workers _________________ Appellant
v.
Suresh Padmanabhan & Anr. ____________________ Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No. 3933 of 2018, decided on July 11, 2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant material.
2. Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the appellant-Union can be impleaded as the party respondent in the proceedings before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 29 of 2018) and the question of law be kept open.
3. Having regard to the submissions, this appeal is allowed and directing impleadment of the appellant-union as the party respondent. The question of law is kept open.
4. The appellant-union shall file its response in the Company Law Appellate Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today.
Civil Appeal No(s). 3933/2018
Tayo Workers Union of 284 Workers ___________________ Appellant
v.
Suresh Padmanabhan & Anr ______________________ Respondent(s)
Date: 11-07-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
(Before R. Banumathi and Navin Sinha, JJ.)
For Appellant(s) Mr. Abhigya, AOR
Mr. Akhilesh Srivastav, Adv.
Smt. Nidhi Singh, Adv.
Mr. Anuj Bhushan, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. R. Sudhinder, Adv.
Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv.
Ms. Nimita Kaul, Adv.
Ms. Amrita Sarkar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
5. Heard.
6. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
———
