(Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. Chelameswar, Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Kumar Goel, JJ.)
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Anr. ____ Petitioner(s)
v.
Union of India _______________________________________ Respondent
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 13/2015, decided on November 19, 2015
With W.P.(C) No. 23/2015, W.P.(C) No. 70/2015, W.P.(C) No. 83/2015 (With Office Report), T.P.(C) No. 391/2015 (Stay and Office Report), W.P.(C) No. 108/2015 (Stay and Office Report), W.P.(C) No. 124/2015 (With Office Report)
W.P.(C) No. 309/2015
(Permission to appear and argue in person and office report)
W.P.(C) No. 310/2015 (Ex-parte stay and office report)
W.P.(C) No. 323/2015 (With office report)
T.P.(C) No. 971/2015
W.P.(C) No. 341/2015 (With office report)
W.P.(C) No. 14/2015
(With appln.(s) for permission to appear and argue in person and stay and Office Report)
W.P.(C) No. 18/2015
(With appln.(s) for permission to appear and argue in person and Office Report)
W.P.(C) No. 24/2015
(With appln.(s) for ex-parte stay and permission to appear and argue in person and Office Report)
W.P.(C) No. 209/2015
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Hearing concluded.
2. Orders reserved.
3. Needless to mention, that the process of appointment of Judges by the ‘Collegium System’ need not remain on hold.
———
