Latest Judgments

Sudha Gupta v. DLF Ltd. and Others

.A. No. 3 is allowed and the names of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are deleted from the array of party, at the risk of the appellant.

(Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.)

Sudha Gupta ______________________________________ Appellant;

v.

DLF Ltd. and Others _____________________________ Respondent(s).

(Appln(s) for permission to delete respondent from array of party and office report)

I.A. No. 3/2013 In Civil Appeal No(s). 9646/2013, decided on March 8, 2016

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. I.A. No. 3 is allowed and the names of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are deleted from the array of party, at the risk of the appellant.

———

Exit mobile version