Latest Judgments

Sri. Mahaliamman Temple and Vigneshwarar Koil Rep by its Trustee v. Vijayammal (Dead) by Lrs.

Application for impleadment is allowed.

(Rohinton Fali Nariman and Indu Malhotra, JJ.)

Sri. Mahaliamman Temple and Vigneshwarar Koil Rep by its Trustee ________________________________________________ Appellant

v.

Vijayammal (Dead) by Lrs. _________________________ Respondent

MA. No. 753 of 2018 in Civil Appeal No. 8607 of 1983, decided on July 11, 2018

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. Application for impleadment is allowed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. We see no reason to modify our order dated 01.03.1996.

4. Accordingly, the M.A. is rejected.

MA No. 753/2018 in Civil Appeal No(s). 8607/1983

Sri. Mahaliamman Temple and Vigneshwarar Koil Rep by its Trustee __________________________________________________ Appellant

v.

Vijayammal (Dead) by Lrs ___________________________ Respondent

IA No. 39943/2018 – Permission to file impleadment.

Date: 11-07-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today.

(Before Rohinton Fali Nariman and Indu Malhotra, JJ.)

For Applicant (s) Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Adv.

Mr. Priyadarshi Banerjee, Adv.

Mr. Pratibhanu Singh Kharola, Adv.

Ms. Garima Jain, Adv.

Ms. Pratiksha Mishra, Adv.

Ms. Pallavi Sengupta, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv.

Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, AOR

Mr. A.K. Upadhyay, Adv.

Mr. Y. Lokesh, Adv.

Mr. Bhuwan Jayant, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

5. Application for impleadment is allowed.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

7. We see no reason to modify our order dated 01.03.1996.

8. Accordingly, the M.A. is rejected in terms of the signed order.

———

Exit mobile version