(Kurian Joseph and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.)
Sompal & Anr. _________________________________ Appellant(s)
v.
The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. ___________________ Respondent(s)
Criminal Appeal No(s). 1065 of 2018 [@ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 6723 of 2018], decided on August 24, 2018
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by
Kurian, J.:—
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellants have been convicted under Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent – complainant submits that the disputes have been amicably settled between the parties and hence, he has no objection in case the offence is compounded.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on both sides, we are of the view that it is in the interest of justice that the offences for which the appellants have been convicted under Sections 324 read with Section 34 IPC in S.T. No. 361 of 2002 on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad are compounded. Ordered accordingly.
4. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed.
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 6723/2018
Sompal & Anr __________________________________ Petitioner(s)
v.
The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr __________________ Respondent(s)
Date : 24-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.
(Before Kurian Joseph and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.)
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Pareena Swarup, Adv.
Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradeep Misra, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, AOR
Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
5. Leave granted.
6. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment.
7. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.
———
