(Deepak Gupta, J.)
Smt. Anuradha W/o. Prafull __________________________ Appellant
v.
Prafull S/o Balkrishna Vaidh _________________________ Respondent
Civil Appeal No(s). 7587 of 2009, decided on July 9, 2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. The sole appellant was represented by Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave, Advocate, who unfortunately expired. Thereafter, a number of time notice was sent to the sole appellant informing her that she may make alternative arrangements for her representation before this Court. All the notices have been received back unserved. The latest notice has been received back with a report that house was locked. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution in terms of the signed order.
CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 7587 OF 2009
Smt. Anuradha W/o. Prafull _______________________ Appellant
v.
Prafull S/o Balkrishna Vaidh ______________________ Respondent
ORDER
2. The sole appellant was represented by Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave, Advocate, who unfortunately expired. Thereafter, a number of time notice was sent to the sole appellant informing her that she may make alternative arrangements for her representation before this Court. All the notices have been received back unserved. The latest notice has been received back with a report that house was locked. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution.
———
